On Wed, 2008-03-05 at 11:01 +0000, Sasha Khapyorsky wrote: > On 00:21 Mon 03 Mar , Yevgeny Kliteynik wrote: > > > > BTW, are you aware of any other IBA 1.2.1 - related issues that need to be > > fixed? > > I mean, is OpenSM fully IBA 1.2.1 compliant?
> At least it is a target, we have "Unsupported IB Compliance Statements" > list in release notes. Of course there could be more issues. Not sure what you mean exactly by fully 1.2.1 compliant. There are two aspects of 1.2.1 changes: 1. Subtle changes in IBA 1.2.1 behavior like this one 2. Optional features added I don't think the spec changes have been compared to OpenSM, at least not as far as I am aware. -- Hal > Sasha > _______________________________________________ > general mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general > > To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
