Hi Hal, On 06:37 Wed 05 Mar , Hal Rosenstock wrote: > On Wed, 2008-03-05 at 11:01 +0000, Sasha Khapyorsky wrote: > > On 00:21 Mon 03 Mar , Yevgeny Kliteynik wrote: > > > > > > BTW, are you aware of any other IBA 1.2.1 - related issues that need to > > > be > > > fixed? > > > I mean, is OpenSM fully IBA 1.2.1 compliant? > > > At least it is a target, we have "Unsupported IB Compliance Statements" > > list in release notes. Of course there could be more issues. > > Not sure what you mean exactly by fully 1.2.1 compliant. > > There are two aspects of 1.2.1 changes: > 1. Subtle changes in IBA 1.2.1 behavior like this one > 2. Optional features added > > I don't think the spec changes have been compared to OpenSM, at least > not as far as I am aware.
I'm not aware too. Do you know how we could prepare a list of 1.2 -> 1.2.1 spec changes? Sasha _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
