Sasha Khapyorsky wrote:
Hi Hal,
On 06:37 Wed 05 Mar , Hal Rosenstock wrote:
On Wed, 2008-03-05 at 11:01 +0000, Sasha Khapyorsky wrote:
On 00:21 Mon 03 Mar , Yevgeny Kliteynik wrote:
BTW, are you aware of any other IBA 1.2.1 - related issues that need to be
fixed?
I mean, is OpenSM fully IBA 1.2.1 compliant?
At least it is a target, we have "Unsupported IB Compliance Statements"
list in release notes. Of course there could be more issues.
Not sure what you mean exactly by fully 1.2.1 compliant.
There are two aspects of 1.2.1 changes:
1. Subtle changes in IBA 1.2.1 behavior like this one
2. Optional features added
I don't think the spec changes have been compared to OpenSM, at least
not as far as I am aware.
I'm not aware too. Do you know how we could prepare a list of 1.2 ->
1.2.1 spec changes?
Actually this is what I meant in my question.
I'm not aware of such list (other than the change bars in the pdf),
so I was just wondering whether there are any changes that need
to be taken care of in OpenSM.
-- Yevgeny
Sasha
_______________________________________________
general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general
To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
_______________________________________________
general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general
To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
