On Feb 6, 2008 11:32 AM, Stuart McCulloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 05/02/2008, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Are there anything in Pax Runner that makes us to hesitate a 1.0 > > release? I think it is one of the most important pieces in the OSGi > > effort here at OPS4J, and we should signal its maturity with a GA > > release. WDYT? -- Niclas. > > > Looking at the issues list there doesn't seem to be any > show-stoppers, so +1 for making the next release 1.0 > > We should probably put out a release candidate first to > get feedback, as from experience it seems people only > start reporting issues just before you do a release ;)
Agree. So, we aim for a 1.0-RC1 as soon as possible. Alin, any comments? Cheers Niclas _______________________________________________ general mailing list general@lists.ops4j.org http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
