On Wednesday 06 February 2008 15:06, Alin Dreghiciu wrote: > Well Pax Runner is 1.0 ready from 0.5.1. But in this case shouldn't we > go for 1.0 also for the parts that makes up Pax Runner as the new Pax > URL (this for sure can go 1.0 if Pax runner goes 1.0). But what about > Base and Pax Swissbox?
Yes, I forgot that Pax Runner is no longer stand-alone :o) > Also maybe is worth going 1.0 only when we have the infrastructure for > Maven central repo deployment in place. I guess this is a good idea. I'll kick Carlos Sanchez and see what happens. http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MAVENUPLOAD-1920 Cheers -- Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug _______________________________________________ general mailing list general@lists.ops4j.org http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
