On 11/02/2008, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wednesday 06 February 2008 15:06, Alin Dreghiciu wrote: > > Well Pax Runner is 1.0 ready from 0.5.1. But in this case shouldn't we > > go for 1.0 also for the parts that makes up Pax Runner as the new Pax > > URL (this for sure can go 1.0 if Pax runner goes 1.0). But what about > > Base and Pax Swissbox? > > Yes, I forgot that Pax Runner is no longer stand-alone :o) > > > Also maybe is worth going 1.0 only when we have the infrastructure for > > Maven central repo deployment in place. > > I guess this is a good idea. I'll kick Carlos Sanchez and see what > happens. > > http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MAVENUPLOAD-1920
cool - I'd like to start uploading some 1.0 poms once the rsync script is in place :) Cheers > -- > Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer > > I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er > I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc > I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug > > _______________________________________________ > general mailing list > general@lists.ops4j.org > http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general > -- Cheers, Stuart
_______________________________________________ general mailing list general@lists.ops4j.org http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
