Hi, Toni, ConfMan requires a CM impl, IIUC.
So, are you saying that the goal is to get pax coin to actually become a compliant cm implementation, rather than running with one? On Aug 13, 2008, at 4:17 PM, Toni Menzel wrote: > As Peter already pointed out PaxCoin is the successor of ConfMan and > probably any other configuration admin. > > But this is my state on this: > Currently "only" the distinguishing features are implemented: a high > abstraction for supporting different kinds of configuration plugins > (so called) which makes it possible to make the format really > independent. > It is good for configure services right now but is missing the Spec > Part: the ConfigurationAdmin itself. > So currently it does not comply to the compendium ConfigAdmin which > has to be done. This is the boring part but keeps PaxCoin currently > from being released for the first time. > > Toni > > > On 13.08.2008, at 07:51, Peter Neubauer wrote: > >> Hi Dave, >> AFAIK, Pax Coin is indeed intended to superceed Pax ConfMan - it >> provides the same functionality via the File System Provider, >> http://wiki.ops4j.org/confluence/display/ops4j/Pax+Coin+-+Provider+-+File+System >> . >> I am not sure how stable Pax Coin is, but I guess Alin can comment on >> the state of affairs ... >> >> /peter >> >> GTalk: neubauer.peter >> Skype peter.neubauer >> ICQ 18762544 >> GTalk neubauer.peter >> Phone +46704 106975 >> LinkedIn http://www.linkedin.com/in/neubauer >> Twitter http://twitter.com/peterneubauer >> >> http://www.neo4j.org - New Energy for Data - the Graph Database. >> http://www.ops4j.org - New Energy for OSS Communities - Open >> Participation Software. >> http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java - Domain Driven >> Development. >> >> >> >> >> On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 5:44 AM, David Leangen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi! >>> >>> Sorry if this has been asked before... but what is the diff between >>> these two projects? >>> >>> Is ConfMan destined to die soon? >>> >>> >>> Cheers, >>> David >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> general mailing list >>> general@lists.ops4j.org >>> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> general mailing list >> general@lists.ops4j.org >> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general > > > _______________________________________________ > general mailing list > general@lists.ops4j.org > http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general _______________________________________________ general mailing list general@lists.ops4j.org http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
