in the long run yes, see wiki "a highly configurable implementation of OSGi Configuration Admin Service Specification"
I don't know much about ConfMan so didn't know that it required a ConfAdmin impl. -------- Original-Nachricht -------- > Datum: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 16:25:35 +0900 > Von: David Leangen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > An: General OPS4J <general@lists.ops4j.org> > Betreff: Re: Difference between ConfMan and Coin > > Hi, Toni, > > ConfMan requires a CM impl, IIUC. > > So, are you saying that the goal is to get pax coin to actually become > a compliant cm implementation, rather than running with one? > > > > > On Aug 13, 2008, at 4:17 PM, Toni Menzel wrote: > > > As Peter already pointed out PaxCoin is the successor of ConfMan and > > probably any other configuration admin. > > > > But this is my state on this: > > Currently "only" the distinguishing features are implemented: a high > > abstraction for supporting different kinds of configuration plugins > > (so called) which makes it possible to make the format really > > independent. > > It is good for configure services right now but is missing the Spec > > Part: the ConfigurationAdmin itself. > > So currently it does not comply to the compendium ConfigAdmin which > > has to be done. This is the boring part but keeps PaxCoin currently > > from being released for the first time. > > > > Toni > > > > > > On 13.08.2008, at 07:51, Peter Neubauer wrote: > > > >> Hi Dave, > >> AFAIK, Pax Coin is indeed intended to superceed Pax ConfMan - it > >> provides the same functionality via the File System Provider, > >> > http://wiki.ops4j.org/confluence/display/ops4j/Pax+Coin+-+Provider+-+File+System > >> . > >> I am not sure how stable Pax Coin is, but I guess Alin can comment on > >> the state of affairs ... > >> > >> /peter > >> > >> GTalk: neubauer.peter > >> Skype peter.neubauer > >> ICQ 18762544 > >> GTalk neubauer.peter > >> Phone +46704 106975 > >> LinkedIn http://www.linkedin.com/in/neubauer > >> Twitter http://twitter.com/peterneubauer > >> > >> http://www.neo4j.org - New Energy for Data - the Graph Database. > >> http://www.ops4j.org - New Energy for OSS Communities - Open > >> Participation Software. > >> http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java - Domain Driven > >> Development. > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 5:44 AM, David Leangen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi! > >>> > >>> Sorry if this has been asked before... but what is the diff between > >>> these two projects? > >>> > >>> Is ConfMan destined to die soon? > >>> > >>> > >>> Cheers, > >>> David > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> general mailing list > >>> general@lists.ops4j.org > >>> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general > >>> > >>> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> general mailing list > >> general@lists.ops4j.org > >> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > general mailing list > > general@lists.ops4j.org > > http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general > > > _______________________________________________ > general mailing list > general@lists.ops4j.org > http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general _______________________________________________ general mailing list general@lists.ops4j.org http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
