2009/6/12 Alin Dreghiciu <adreghi...@gmail.com>

> So, Base it is. Mutual consensus.
>

+1

Looking further we have the master pom that include all the common stuff for
> pax projects. But the same "setup" is also in base and I would expect that a
> lot of it it will be duplicated in all non pax projects (e.g. gaderian?) as
> those projects do not have a pom to inherit from. This means that if we
> change something we have to change all of this projects that do not have a
> parent. So, I propose to create a new master ops4j pom that will be
> inherited for now by base and pax master and in the future by any ops4j
> projects, directly or indirectly.
>

yep, a general OPS4J pom makes sense


> WDYT?
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 6:31 PM, Alin Dreghiciu <adreghi...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Guys,
>> to move forward with our releases to Maven central we must start by
>> releasing base. To do so, we should first decide about the name. For me BASE
>> is good enough. If nobody has something against I will then release the
>> current code as 1.0.0. Soon :)
>>
>> On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 4:50 PM, Niclas Hedhman <nic...@hedhman.org>wrote:
>>
>>> It has been different since there were non-OSGi projects using BASE. I
>>> think that kind of still makes sense.
>>>
>>> I have no current idea what to call it though, as back then when it came
>>> to being. Commons, Foundation, Stilts, BootyClasses....
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>> Niclas
>>>
>>> On May 28, 2009 8:26 PM, "Toni Menzel" <t...@okidokiteam.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> mhh.. what IS actually base. Why not marry it with swissbox ? I know
>>> its PAX Swissbox (=osgi related) but.. hey, we are speaking of a nice
>>> package of nice helpers and utilities. They are all somehow meant to
>>> be osgi compatible at least.
>>>
>>> So, why not make Swissbox right, rethink its inner packaging /
>>> Submodules and include what was BASE before.
>>>
>>> wdyt ?
>>> Also, once things get "too important" to be in a swissbox sink, they
>>> can be graduated out of it. (thinking of tinybundes in future .. don't
>>> beat me for the name ;)
>>>
>>> On 5/28/09, Stuart McCulloch <mccu...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2009/5/28 Alin
>>> Dreghiciu <adreghi...@gma...
>>> --
>>> Toni Menzel
>>> Independent Software Developer
>>> Professional Profile: http://okidokiteam.com
>>> t...@okidokiteam.com
>>>
>>> http://www.ops4j.org - New Energy for OSS Communities - Open
>>> Participation Software.
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________ general mailing list
>>> general@lists.ops4j.org http://...
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> general mailing list
>>> general@lists.ops4j.org
>>> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Alin Dreghiciu
>> Software Developer - Looking for new projects!
>> My profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/alindreghiciu
>>  My blog: http://adreghiciu.blogspot.com
>> http://www.ops4j.org - New Energy for OSS Communities - Open
>> Participation Software.
>> http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java - Domain Driven Development.
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Alin Dreghiciu
> Software Developer - Looking for new projects!
> My profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/alindreghiciu
> My blog: http://adreghiciu.blogspot.com
> http://www.ops4j.org - New Energy for OSS Communities - Open Participation
> Software.
> http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java - Domain Driven Development.
>
> _______________________________________________
> general mailing list
> general@lists.ops4j.org
> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
>
>


-- 
Cheers, Stuart
_______________________________________________
general mailing list
general@lists.ops4j.org
http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general

Reply via email to