And guys, come up with a new name for ops4j base. On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 1:22 PM, Niclas Hedhman <nic...@hedhman.org> wrote:
> On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 6:16 PM, Alin Dreghiciu <adreghi...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > For 1) I think we do not have released artifacts that depends on > snapshots. > > Do we? > > For 2), after discussion with Sonatype guys they say that is just > > a recommendation, not something mandatory. And if we do move all is in > > the http://repository.ops4j.org/mvn-releases we will get all our > > dependencies (beside dependency on osgi artifacts) into central anyhow. > > Question is we should apply this only for > 1.0 releases. > > Why not just "do the right thing", and gradually move things to > m2release, one by one, with review for each? > > Wholesale "grab and dump", sounds like a "hack" because we are generally > lazy. > > > Suggested Action Plan; > > 1. Release "Base" under a new name, and as 1.0. > > 2. Release Pax URL and Pax Swissbox as 1.0. > > And all of them to /m2release. Once those are out the door, Runner Web > and Exam can follow reasonably soon after. > > > Cheers > -- > Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer > http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java > > I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er > I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc > I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug > > _______________________________________________ > general mailing list > general@lists.ops4j.org > http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general > -- Alin Dreghiciu Software Developer - Looking for new projects! My profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/alindreghiciu My blog: http://adreghiciu.blogspot.com http://www.ops4j.org - New Energy for OSS Communities - Open Participation Software. http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java - Domain Driven Development.
_______________________________________________ general mailing list general@lists.ops4j.org http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
