As some of you may not know already: I'm not a big fan of having IDE files in project directories ... however, this destillation of the core problem was inspiring: why do not make the formatter a project itself?
Something like: <SVN>/projects/pax/codeformatter to bundle resources and installation guides for various IDEs - and finally 'pax'-ing one more reasons for IDE flame-wars ... I'm not much of an IDEA user, but in Eclipse this model works. WDYT? Cheers, Matthias On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 5:10 AM, Niclas Hedhman <hedh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 5:44 AM, Alin Dreghiciu<adreghi...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Mostly. The only one that is missing now when you create a project from > > maven poms with IDEA is the java version ad code style. An most I miss is > > code style, as if someone misses that they just run the code formatter > and > > the whole source is toasted. > > Yes, if it wasn't for the formatter, I would be Ok to only use POM. > > The new .idea/ format doesn't make things much better either, and I > can see this becoming a real problem, real soon, as more and more > people start helping out, and a combo of both Eclipse and IDEA are > being used more than the past (perhaps some Netbeans folks too)... > > If the formatter issue could be solved in a generic way, then I am Ok > to drop those files out of SVN. > > > Cheers > -- > Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer > http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java > > I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er > I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc > I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug > > _______________________________________________ > general mailing list > general@lists.ops4j.org > http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general >
_______________________________________________ general mailing list general@lists.ops4j.org http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
