Hi Michael,

The Pax Exam Karaf Container is developed and support by the Apache Karaf
community. I think its best to seek support for your Karaf specific
questions there. Looking at both of you questions its nothing we (at least)
can answer from a Pax Exam Core standpoint.

Cheers,
Toni

Toni Menzel | Founder | Rebaze GmbH
toni.men...@rebaze.com | www.rebaze.com
Access To Alien Technology: Great software needs a great foundation. We
help unlocking the next level in technology.
Rebaze Pass for Maven <http://goo.gl/1YLlt>, Rebaze Pass for
OSGi<http://goo.gl/WP8XT>
, Rebaze Pass for Neo4j <http://www.rebaze.com/services/>, Rebaze Pass for
Jenkins <http://www.rebaze.com/services/>



On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 10:17 AM, Michael Szalay
<michael.sza...@basis06.ch>wrote:

> Hi all
>
> I have two questions regarding using Pax Exam to test our system which is
> based on Apache Karaf.
>
> 1) Is it possible to test our custom karaf distribution? I.e. instead of
> that pax-exam downloads a karaf distro, it uses
>    our custom karaf distro?
>
> 2) Sometimes, my integration tests do just not work. The pax exam systems
> comes up, but hangs very long time and then
> the test each fail with the message:
>
> Exception in thread "JMX Connector Thread [service:jmx:rmi://
> 0.0.0.0:44444/jndi/rmi://0.0.0.0:1099/karaf-root]"
> java.lang.RuntimeException:
> Port already in use: 44444;
> You may have started two containers.  If you need to start a second
> container or the default ports are already in use update the config file
> etc/org.apache.karaf.management.cfg and change the Registry Port and Server
> Port to unused ports
>
>
> The port 44444 was not used before I started the maven tests...
> Is this a concurrency issue?
>
> Regards Michael
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> general mailing list
> general@lists.ops4j.org
> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
>
_______________________________________________
general mailing list
general@lists.ops4j.org
http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general

Reply via email to