Hi, +1 to what Curt/Niclas said. Let's do the transition all at once, get it over with. I don't anticipate trouble. I will help check integrity, etc.
Let's pick a specific day to do it, preferably a weekend day. Once we pick a date, let's annouce it to our users and put it on the web site. Yoav --- Mark Womack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm good with this. The quicker, the better. But all the subprojects need > to be ready and dedicated to do it in the same timeframe. I'm assuming Curt > will be coordinating log4cxx. If we do it after log4j 1.2.12 release I can > coordinate it for log4j. Nicko, will you be prepared for log4net? I need > to check, but I don't see a repository for log4php offhand. > > -Mark > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Curt Arnold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2005 9:20 PM > > To: Logging General > > Subject: Re: SVN Migration? > > > > > > On Jul 13, 2005, at 11:53 AM, Mark Womack wrote: > > > > > The PMC had decided that all of the LS subprojects would be > > > converted to > > > Subversion for source control by July of this year. So far, no > > > projects > > > have done the conversion. Ceki started the log4j conversion, but > > > it was > > > stopped before it could be affected, and no one has volunteered to > > > complete > > > the task. > > > > > > Are any of the other subprojects looking into the conversion? > > > Anyone want > > > to be the sacrificial guinea pig? :-) > > > > > > -Mark > > > > I think it may be better to do all the sub-projects at one fell > > swoop. I don't think that having a "test" project would buy us much > > in reducing the overall disruption. Infrastructure should have > > gotten pretty good at this by now. I'd suggest that just after > > 1.2.12 is released, we switch all the sub-projects over to Subversion. > >
