Here is a link I dug up. I guess we should check with infrastructure to see how up to date it is.
http://apache.org/dev/cvs2svn.html -Mark > -----Original Message----- > From: Nicko Cadell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2005 11:29 AM > To: Logging General > Subject: RE: SVN Migration? > > I'm happy to do the necessary work for the log4net SVN migration, > whatever that is. > Do we have any guidance on the repository layout etc.. or do we just > live with what infrastructure migrate for us and move things around > afterwards? > > Nicko > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Mark Womack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: 20 July 2005 17:41 > > To: 'Logging General' > > Subject: RE: SVN Migration? > > > > I'm good with this. The quicker, the better. But all the > > subprojects need to be ready and dedicated to do it in the > > same timeframe. I'm assuming Curt will be coordinating > > log4cxx. If we do it after log4j 1.2.12 release I can > > coordinate it for log4j. Nicko, will you be prepared for > > log4net? I need to check, but I don't see a repository for > > log4php offhand. > > > > -Mark > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Curt Arnold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2005 9:20 PM > > > To: Logging General > > > Subject: Re: SVN Migration? > > > > > > > > > On Jul 13, 2005, at 11:53 AM, Mark Womack wrote: > > > > > > > The PMC had decided that all of the LS subprojects would be > > > > converted to Subversion for source control by July of > > this year. So > > > > far, no projects have done the conversion. Ceki started > > the log4j > > > > conversion, but it was stopped before it could be > > affected, and no > > > > one has volunteered to complete the task. > > > > > > > > Are any of the other subprojects looking into the conversion? > > > > Anyone want > > > > to be the sacrificial guinea pig? :-) > > > > > > > > -Mark > > > > > > I think it may be better to do all the sub-projects at one > > fell swoop. > > > I don't think that having a "test" project would buy us much > > > in reducing the overall disruption. Infrastructure should have > > > gotten pretty good at this by now. I'd suggest that just after > > > 1.2.12 is released, we switch all the sub-projects over to > > Subversion. > > > >
