On Thursday 21 July 2005 02:38, Mark Womack wrote: > Here is a link I dug up. I guess we should check with infrastructure to > see how up to date it is. > > http://apache.org/dev/cvs2svn.html
It is very up to date. For the Logging Service project to make the minimum impact on Infra@ at the moment, I would recommend that a "flat" conversion of each of the CVS repos are made, and then move stuff around after the fact. You will get a repo at /repos/asf/logging as the root node, so suggest that each of the CVS repos is placed under there with the current names, and with the ttb (trunk/tags/branches) under each of those. A simple request that the "logging-" prefix is dropped is no big deal, and accommodated without any reflections. That will sure be appreciated. There exist other easy-to-convert scenarios, but I don't know which those guys like the best. (other than above). I also see that they now recommend that the dry-run into /repos/test happens in one shot with the real thing. (This wasn't the case a year ago.) Please note the big warning about binary files. This needs to be attended to asap, but should already have shown its ugly face. Cheers Niclas
