Hi Henri,
We are planning to migrate all of the Logging Services projects to svn.
We'd like to target the timeframe of 9/10 for the project-wide migration.
Is that timeframe ok with you? What are the things we need to decide as
part of the migration?
One thing I was wondering in regards to the sandbox, should we have a
sandbox per project or maybe a top level sandbox that more people can play
in .
thanks,
-Mark
----- Original Message -----
From: "Henri Yandell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Mark Womack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Shapira, Yoav" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, July 24, 2005 5:59 PM
Subject: Re: Logging-Log4j -> SVN
Pinging again :)
CVS-wise you've got:
logging-chainsaw/
logging-log4cxx/
logging-log4j/
logging-log4j-attic/
logging-log4j-sandbox/
logging-log4net/
logging-log4php/
logging-site/
Are they all still active?
The obvious mapping to SVN would be:
logging/
chainsaw/
trunk/ branches/ tags/
log4cxx/
trunk/ branches/ tags/
log4j/
attic/
sandbox/
trunk/ branches/ tags/
proper/
trunk/ branches/ tags/
log4net/
trunk/ branches/ tags/
log4php/
trunk/ branches/ tags/
site/
Only using 'proper' as the alternative to sandbox as that's what
commons/taglibs uses.
Hen
