I have not gotten any indication that folks are going to be available tomorrow besides Henri and myself. I don't think we should approve the migration until someone from each subproject reviews and approves.

So, please spend some time this weekend reviewing the initial conversion that Henri has performed and post feedback here. We will finalize the migration before the end of next week.

[Henri, sorry if this seems to be taking longer than expected. We'll get it wrapped up quickly though]

thanks,
-Mark

----- Original Message ----- From: "Mark Womack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Logging General" <[email protected]>; "Henri Yandell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, September 09, 2005 8:08 AM
Subject: Re: Logging-Log4j -> SVN


Should we set up some kind of Yahoo! IM Conference or an IRC chat channel for tomorrow? I can set up a Yahoo! conference, but I don't know if everyone has a yahoo id. I don't know how to set up an irc channel. Who is going to be around?

-Mark

----- Original Message ----- From: "Mark Womack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Henri Yandell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Logging General" <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, September 04, 2005 4:01 PM
Subject: Re: Logging-Log4j -> SVN


Hi Henri,

We are planning to migrate all of the Logging Services projects to svn. We'd like to target the timeframe of 9/10 for the project-wide migration. Is that timeframe ok with you? What are the things we need to decide as part of the migration?

One thing I was wondering in regards to the sandbox, should we have a sandbox per project or maybe a top level sandbox that more people can play in .

thanks,
-Mark

----- Original Message ----- From: "Henri Yandell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Mark Womack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Shapira, Yoav" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, July 24, 2005 5:59 PM
Subject: Re: Logging-Log4j -> SVN



Pinging again :)

CVS-wise you've got:

logging-chainsaw/
logging-log4cxx/
logging-log4j/
logging-log4j-attic/
logging-log4j-sandbox/
logging-log4net/
logging-log4php/
logging-site/

Are they all still active?

The obvious mapping to SVN would be:

logging/
  chainsaw/
    trunk/ branches/ tags/
  log4cxx/
    trunk/ branches/ tags/
  log4j/
    attic/
    sandbox/
      trunk/ branches/ tags/
    proper/
      trunk/ branches/ tags/
  log4net/
    trunk/ branches/ tags/
  log4php/
    trunk/ branches/ tags/
  site/

Only using 'proper' as the alternative to sandbox as that's what commons/taglibs uses.

Hen








Reply via email to