On 2011-08-17, Christian Grobmeier wrote: >> So this looks OK for most sub-projects. chainsaw lives directly under >> logging so the fallback is the only one that matches. Should it go to a >> different list instead?
> I think it should go to [email protected] because user and > dev lists are used from log4j too I happen to be able to change that if there is consensus (as should be Curt). >> Shall I expand INFRA-3858 (make the mbox archive of log4net-cvs public) >> to include the other *-cvs lists in addition as well? > Yes, that would be great - thanks again! Done. Stefan
