> when I asked to publish the archives of the commits mailing lists it > turned out that the various log4*-cvs lists don't really exist, mails > actually go to the dev lists (with the exception of chainsaw which sends > its commit mails here).
ouch. Thanks for asking there > Before I ask infra to do the wrong thing, do you (do we) want to keep > the commit mails on the dev lists or do we want to create real mailing > lists for this? > > In the former case nothing needs to be done on the infrastructure side, > only the config for chainsaw may need to be adapted. Otherwise we'd > have a bunch of new mailing lists to be created. Good question. As there are not really tons of commits, is it more pragmatic to have a single [email protected] list for all products? We can split of as a project grows again. Drawback is of course that everybody gets all commit messages. Well maybe, it is good actually and maybe there is a chance to fliter them out. At the moment I prefer commits@ to keep oversight on all these small projects Others? Cheers > > Stefan > -- http://www.grobmeier.de
