+1
On Aug 17, 2011, at 3:00 AM, Christian Grobmeier <[email protected]>
wrote:
when I asked to publish the archives of the commits mailing lists it
turned out that the various log4*-cvs lists don't really exist, mails
actually go to the dev lists (with the exception of chainsaw which
sends
its commit mails here).
ouch. Thanks for asking there
Before I ask infra to do the wrong thing, do you (do we) want to keep
the commit mails on the dev lists or do we want to create real
mailing
lists for this?
In the former case nothing needs to be done on the infrastructure
side,
only the config for chainsaw may need to be adapted. Otherwise we'd
have a bunch of new mailing lists to be created.
Good question.
As there are not really tons of commits, is it more pragmatic to have
a single [email protected]
list for all products? We can split of as a project grows again.
Drawback is of course that everybody gets all commit messages. Well
maybe, it is good actually and maybe there is a chance to fliter them
out.
At the moment I prefer commits@ to keep oversight on all these small
projects
Others?
Cheers
Stefan
--
http://www.grobmeier.de
