On Dec 30, 2010, at 5:48 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote: > > : My vote is -1 to the current resolution, because it lacks a plan for > : continuity for the userbase. It seems that although development has > : stagnated, there is actually a reasonably active user list, and this > : resolution doesn't describe what will happen to them. > > I share robert's concern, the lucene.net mailing list(s) is where the > existing community seems to be rallying to discuss an incubation proposal, > and i don't wnat to pull the rug out from under them. > > I'm assuming that just because this resolution says the project resources > will be shutdown, doesn't mean they need to be terminated > immediately upon the completion of hte vote -- while things like svn > commit and the website updating should happen ASAP, it seems reasonable to > leave the mailing lists in place for the near future. > > I'm +1 based on that assumption. >
Correct. It should be noted that the community is now working on an Incubator proposal, so we should be able to make a smooth transition. -Grant
