Awesome is where we start... ;) Thanks, Troy
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 9:17 AM, Simon Willnauer <simon.willna...@googlemail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 4:43 PM, Grant Ingersoll <gsing...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> On Dec 30, 2010, at 5:48 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote: >> >>> >>> : My vote is -1 to the current resolution, because it lacks a plan for >>> : continuity for the userbase. It seems that although development has >>> : stagnated, there is actually a reasonably active user list, and this >>> : resolution doesn't describe what will happen to them. >>> >>> I share robert's concern, the lucene.net mailing list(s) is where the >>> existing community seems to be rallying to discuss an incubation proposal, >>> and i don't wnat to pull the rug out from under them. >>> >>> I'm assuming that just because this resolution says the project resources >>> will be shutdown, doesn't mean they need to be terminated >>> immediately upon the completion of hte vote -- while things like svn >>> commit and the website updating should happen ASAP, it seems reasonable to >>> leave the mailing lists in place for the near future. >>> >>> I'm +1 based on that assumption. >>> >> >> Correct. It should be noted that the community is now working on an >> Incubator proposal, so we should be able to make a smooth transition. > That is awesome news! > > simon >> >> -Grant >> >> >
