On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 4:43 PM, Grant Ingersoll <gsing...@apache.org> wrote: > > On Dec 30, 2010, at 5:48 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote: > >> >> : My vote is -1 to the current resolution, because it lacks a plan for >> : continuity for the userbase. It seems that although development has >> : stagnated, there is actually a reasonably active user list, and this >> : resolution doesn't describe what will happen to them. >> >> I share robert's concern, the lucene.net mailing list(s) is where the >> existing community seems to be rallying to discuss an incubation proposal, >> and i don't wnat to pull the rug out from under them. >> >> I'm assuming that just because this resolution says the project resources >> will be shutdown, doesn't mean they need to be terminated >> immediately upon the completion of hte vote -- while things like svn >> commit and the website updating should happen ASAP, it seems reasonable to >> leave the mailing lists in place for the near future. >> >> I'm +1 based on that assumption. >> > > Correct. It should be noted that the community is now working on an > Incubator proposal, so we should be able to make a smooth transition. That is awesome news!
simon > > -Grant > >
