Well, if you want to carry the hack further, make a copy of the property and give it a different name. Then create a facet on the copied property. Since it is a different facet it will get filtered against the first.
Jun Zhao wrote: > Hi David, > > Thank you for your prompt answer. > > I have tried this. However, this gets confusing if users want to > construct an AND in two steps. The second facet will not get filtered > when you make a selection in the first facet, because they are copies of > one another. > > Thanks, > > Jun > > > David Karger wrote: > >> One hack that seems to work is to create two copies of the same >> facet---then you get a conjunction of what is selected within each. >> This isn't as elegant as AND over a single facet, but it is more >> powerful because you can AND two separate "ORs", as in selecting color >> "red or green" AND "blue or yellow". >> >> Jun Zhao wrote: >> >> >>> Hello there, >>> >>> Now in Exhibit if I select multiple conditions in one facet, I will get >>> everything that satisfies any of the filtering conditions. I am >>> wondering whether there is anyway I can make these multiple conditions >>> conjunctive, to get me everything that needs to satisfy all the >>> filtering conditions. >>> >>> Many thanks, >>> >>> Jun >>> _______________________________________________ >>> General mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://simile.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/general >>> >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> General mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://simile.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/general >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > General mailing list > [email protected] > http://simile.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/general > _______________________________________________ General mailing list [email protected] http://simile.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/general
