David Karger wrote: > I suppose one could argue for "simplifying" any facet by leaving out any > value that is tied to _every_ element in the active set---that would fix > this one pathological case, Yes, our case is a bit unusual. But the motive of my starting point is to allow users to have an AND relationship between the conditions. I guess another thing that I could try, is to associate the property Px with a RDF collection, containing A and B. Then they would be able to find resources all sharing that collection of values.
The last thing I want to happen is when I show Exhibit to my users, they got confused by seeing another A in facet Py. Thank you very much for your helps. I liked your example of searching for the spicy food recipe. :-) --- Jun > and might even be useful for less > pathological scenarios: for example, after I narrow my recipes down to > "ingredient contains chili peppers" it might be pointless for my > "flavors" facet to still contain "spicy" as an option. > > Jun Zhao wrote: > >> Hi David, >> >> No, I am not sure about this. If I have an item I1, and has two >> properties Px, Py, where Py is a copy of Px but with a different name, >> then I should have: >> >> I1 Px A >> I1 Py A >> I1 Px B >> I1 Py B >> >> When I select Px=A for I1, then in the facet of Py, I should still see >> the value of B AND A, because item I1's property Py has the values of A >> and B. But in facet Py, I don't want to show the "A" to the users, but >> only the "B", to help them to continue to filter their records. >> >> That's my understanding about how the facet browsing works in Exhibit. >> Please correct me if I am wrong or I misinterpreted what you meant as >> making a copy of the property >> >> Thanks, >> >> Jun >> >> David Karger wrote: >> >> >>> Well, if you want to carry the hack further, make a copy of the property >>> and give it a different name. Then create a facet on the copied >>> property. Since it is a different facet it will get filtered against >>> the first. >>> >>> Jun Zhao wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> Hi David, >>>> >>>> Thank you for your prompt answer. >>>> >>>> I have tried this. However, this gets confusing if users want to >>>> construct an AND in two steps. The second facet will not get filtered >>>> when you make a selection in the first facet, because they are copies of >>>> one another. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> Jun >>>> >>>> >>>> David Karger wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> One hack that seems to work is to create two copies of the same >>>>> facet---then you get a conjunction of what is selected within each. >>>>> This isn't as elegant as AND over a single facet, but it is more >>>>> powerful because you can AND two separate "ORs", as in selecting color >>>>> "red or green" AND "blue or yellow". >>>>> >>>>> Jun Zhao wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Hello there, >>>>>> >>>>>> Now in Exhibit if I select multiple conditions in one facet, I will get >>>>>> everything that satisfies any of the filtering conditions. I am >>>>>> wondering whether there is anyway I can make these multiple conditions >>>>>> conjunctive, to get me everything that needs to satisfy all the >>>>>> filtering conditions. >>>>>> >>>>>> Many thanks, >>>>>> >>>>>> Jun >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> General mailing list >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>> http://simile.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/general >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> General mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> http://simile.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/general >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> General mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://simile.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/general >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> General mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://simile.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/general >>> >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> General mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://simile.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/general >> >> > _______________________________________________ > General mailing list > [email protected] > http://simile.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/general > _______________________________________________ General mailing list [email protected] http://simile.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/general
