Jun Zhao wrote: > Hi David, > > I think this might just be a little bit confusing for my users, because > the A, B, and D are really flat with each other. It is more intuitive > for them if we have: > > First column Second column > > A (47) checked B (10) > B (28) D (7) > C (17) > D (18) > > But if this layout is publicly available, I can give it a go and see what > feedback I can get from my users. > Interesting way to lay out in columns. That might actually be more intuitive than what I suggested (laying out hierarchically). But it does take up more space.
No, we don't have that layout available. I'll let you know if I get around to coding it. > By the way, this actually brought up another functionality desired by > me: using a taxonomy tree in a facet. I am thinking about having a facet > that have > > + A (47) > + B (28) > + C (17) > + D (18) > > and then the following, after you expand the + besides A (with A1, A2, > and A3 as children of A): > > + A (47) > + A1 (20) > + A2 (15) > + A3 (12) > + B (28) > + C (17) > + D (18) > > I didn't find support of this in the maillist, and not sure whether this > is widely expected by other users. > Yes, I am quite aware of the need for hierarchical facets (and more...). I just didn't expect the feature request so soon :-) David _______________________________________________ General mailing list [email protected] http://simile.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/general
