Hi Jeff,
I did mean
<div><span ex:if-exists=".related">See
<b ex:content=".related"></b>
</span></div>
(although I made a mistake and wrote </a> instead of </b>). If you try
that, you'd be able to click on each link and get a pop up showing that
item. But is that what you meant by "bad link"? I admit not entirely
understanding what you mean.
Here is another possible solution to try:
<div><span ex:if-exists=".related">See
<b ex:content=".related"><a ex:href-subcontent="#{{value}}"
target="_blank" ex:content="value"></a></b>
</span></div>
David
Jeff Spitzer wrote:
> David,
>
> I think you meant
>
> <div><span ex:if-exists=".related">See
> <a ex:content=".related"><b ex:content=".related"> </b></a>
> </span></div>
>
> which is just to use
> ex:content
> instead of
> ex:href-content
> (which is what I had).
>
> Indeed, that got rid of the problem of the word "and" being a bad
> link, but now the links themselves are breaking. Properties that are
> not under ".related" for a particular label are showing up, and the
> word "and" is showing up unpredictably.
>
> Take a look at
> http://jeffrey.spitzer.net/exhibit/jhexhibitbrokenlinks.html
>
> I modified the code as you suggested in the tabular view but not in
> tile view.
> Select the facets type:period, importance:2, and Period:Biblical, and
> flip back and forth between tabular and tile and you'll see that
> tabular doesn't have "and" as a bad link, but it has all kinds of
> incorrect links. The correct links are in tile-view.
>
> Jeff
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> General mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://simile.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/general
>
_______________________________________________
General mailing list
[email protected]
http://simile.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/general
