Exhibit 2.0 actually uses Timeline 2.0.

I have to look back at my SVN commit logs to see what I've improved 
exactly, but here are a few things:
- ability to programmatically scroll a band and pop up a bubble for a 
particular event given its ID
- slightly better re-factored code for overriding styles and behaviors
- new layout of events that may be better in some cases, e.g.,
    http://people.csail.mit.edu/dfhuynh/misc/detailed-layout/jfk.html

David

Todd Chapman wrote:
> I guess we are using Timeline 1.0. There is no "2.0" in the api path. 
> Are there any examples that use 2.0? What are the advantages?
>
> On 2/4/08, *David Huynh* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>
>     Which version of Timeline are you using? 1.0? or 2.0 here
>         http://static.simile.mit.edu/timeline/api-2.0/timeline-api.js
>
>     David
>
>     Todd Chapman wrote:
>     > We have our own jQuery at the latest version. Perhaps we should
>     excise
>     > jQuery from Timeline and tell it where to find our Query?
>     >
>     > On 2/1/08, *Axel Hecht* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>     > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>> wrote:
>     >
>     >     AFAICT, timeline includes SimileAjax, which itself has
>     jQuery1.2.1
>     >     in it.
>     >
>     >     Not precisely sure what you want, do you want jquery, or do
>     you have
>     >     your own non-jquery stuff using $? Or do you want a
>     different version
>     >     of jquery?
>     >
>     >     Axel
>     >
>     >     2008/2/1, Todd Chapman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>>:
>     >     > For some reason Timeline messes up some jQuery modal stuff our
>     >     designers
>     >     > built.
>     >     >
>     >     > I realize that jQuery has a noconflict mode, but our designers
>     >     are used to
>     >     > using the jQuery "$" shortcut. Is there a noconflict mode for
>     >     Timeline? Has
>     >     > anyone run into this problem before?
>     >     >
>     >     > Thanks!
>     >     >
>     >     > -Todd
>     >     >
>     >     > _______________________________________________
>     >     > General mailing list
>     >     > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>     <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>     >     > http://simile.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/general
>     >     >
>     >     >
>     >     _______________________________________________
>     >     General mailing list
>     >     [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>     <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>     >     http://simile.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/general
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     >
>     > _______________________________________________
>     > General mailing list
>     > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>     > http://simile.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/general
>     >
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     General mailing list
>     [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>     http://simile.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/general
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> General mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://simile.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/general
>   

_______________________________________________
General mailing list
[email protected]
http://simile.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/general

Reply via email to