Todd, I really don't know. Is there a URL where I can observe this conflict?
David Todd Chapman wrote: > David, > > So can you think of any reason why Timeline 1.0 might interfere with > jQuery such that we have to use jQuery in noConflict mode? Thanks. > > -Todd > > On 2/4/08, David Huynh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Which version of Timeline are you using? 1.0? or 2.0 here >> http://static.simile.mit.edu/timeline/api-2.0/timeline-api.js >> >> David >> >> Todd Chapman wrote: >> >>> We have our own jQuery at the latest version. Perhaps we should excise >>> jQuery from Timeline and tell it where to find our Query? >>> >>> On 2/1/08, *Axel Hecht* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: >>> >>> AFAICT, timeline includes SimileAjax, which itself has jQuery1.2.1 >>> in it. >>> >>> Not precisely sure what you want, do you want jquery, or do you have >>> your own non-jquery stuff using $? Or do you want a different version >>> of jquery? >>> >>> Axel >>> >>> 2008/2/1, Todd Chapman <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>: >>> > For some reason Timeline messes up some jQuery modal stuff our >>> designers >>> > built. >>> > >>> > I realize that jQuery has a noconflict mode, but our designers >>> are used to >>> > using the jQuery "$" shortcut. Is there a noconflict mode for >>> Timeline? Has >>> > anyone run into this problem before? >>> > >>> > Thanks! >>> > >>> > -Todd >>> _______________________________________________ General mailing list [email protected] http://simile.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/general
