On Mon, 16 Jul 2001, Jon Stevens wrote:

> <style> task. So, unless you step up and create something
> better/faster/cheaper/easier, I am not going to consider your -1 as being
> valid.
>
> :-)

Luckily we have a rule for that - if someone believes a -1 is not valid,
all we need is a second commiter 'confirming' the -1 and its reasons.

So: I believe Scott's -1 is valid, and your claims that it's invalid are
not.

I think on Apache "standards" should mean something.


Costin


---------------------------------------------------------------------
In case of troubles, e-mail:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail:          [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to