> Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: > while the world of native XML databases is full of marketing hype and > promises, it is evident (for all those who tried) that mapping general > XML schemas to relational databases can be sometimes very painful and > not very efficient. <snip/>
+1 for the general idea (but I'm not a committer), *but* before we can really vote we'll have to get several things clear (others already mentioned a lot of them). My personal opinion about the programming language: C/C++! Java is far too slow. But the database must have built-in APIs for C/C++, Java, Perl, Python and Tcl/Tk, maybe more. Best regards, Martin Stricker -- Homepage: http://www.martin-stricker.de/ Registered Linux user #210635: http://counter.li.org/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- In case of troubles, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
