I hadn't even thought of that. My general concern was to have spelled out the circumstances in which a) all committers on XML sub-projects or b) all committers on a particular sub-project are being referred to. It's not enough to rely on context.
Your point is, of course, valid.
Peter
J.Pietschmann wrote:
Peter B. West wrote:
a two-thirds majority of committers.
Again, which committers?
Indeed, given that there are usually quite a few "inactive" committers for a specific (sub-)project. It might be necessary to keep records of committers currently eligible for 2/3 majorities....
-- Peter B. West [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.powerup.com.au/~pbwest/ "Lord, to whom shall we go?"
--------------------------------------------------------------------- In case of troubles, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
