My nitpicking was based on the _required_ votes. I think we should have as little required votes as possible.
Indeed. There should be some common sense and perhaps tradition applied to what's voted on. I think the charter can mention "important issues regarding the codebase", with releases to be explicitely declared important, perhaps a few examples what's *usually* considered important, and leave details to the community. Of course, any issue a committer initiates a vote about is automatically raised to "important" status.
J.Pietschmann
--------------------------------------------------------------------- In case of troubles, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
