Correct, that's why its common practice to provide both zip and tar
files, with the tar files better suited for distribution to Linux systems
Chris
On 30/05/2015 19:56, Luis Bernardo wrote:
Yes, it seems that this may be a limitation of the basic usage of the
zip format.
On 5/30/15 6:31 PM, Andreas Delmelle wrote:
On 30 May 2015, at 12:36, Luis Bernardo <[email protected]>
wrote:
I found a minor problem that I would like others to double check.
In the zip files, both the bin and the src, the fop script is not
executable (tested on Linux and Mac OS X). The problem does not
happen with the tar.gz files.
Indeed. I had never noticed it before, but same thing here.
That said, I quickly checked the zips for 1.1, and they were that
way as well.
BTW - Forgot to mention that it is already that way *in* the zip
archive, when you check the contents with zipinfo. All files
(non-directory) in the archive show as "-rw-r--r--"
KR
Andreas
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
