Hi Katrina,

This is good to know. Would you please also let me know how access the
latest knowngene table throught mysql query?

On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 1:29 PM, Katrina Learned <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Peng,
>
> The UCSC Genes track on mm9 is fairly old (last updated in September of
> 2007), and we are actively working on an updated
> version of the mm9 UCSC Genes track, which can be previewed here:
> http://genome-preview.ucsc.edu/
>
> On the preview browser, if you open UCSC Genes (which will be the new
> version of the track) and go to the location of Mpg, you'll see that the
> negative strand transcript that was previously labeled as Mpg, is now being
> labeled as Nprl3, which is consistent with RefSeq. One of its alternate
> names listed is Mare. This updated version of the UCSC Genes track on mm9
> should have many improvements of this kind.
>
> Please contact the mail list ([email protected]) again if you have any
> further questions.
>
> Katrina Learned
> UCSC Genome Bioinformatics Group
>
> Peng Yu wrote, On 04/01/11 02:55:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I find an error in mm9 knownGene. Mpg and Mare are at the same locus.
>> 2 Mpg genes are on the '+' strand and 1 Mpg gene is on the '-' strand.
>> However, the one on the '-' strand to be Mare rather than Mpg. I think
>> that there may be other errors like this in knownGene. This makes me
>> wonder how gene names are assigned to the knownGenes and why such
>> error occurs.
>>
>>
>



-- 
Regards,
Peng
_______________________________________________
Genome maillist  -  [email protected]
https://lists.soe.ucsc.edu/mailman/listinfo/genome

Reply via email to