22.09.2011, 23:39, "Martin Luessi" <[email protected]>: > 2011/9/22 Konstantin Tokarev <[email protected]>: > >> 22.09.2011, 23:32, "Martin Luessi" <[email protected]>: >>> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 10:45 AM, Ricky Egeland <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> On Sep 22, 2011, at 8:35 AM, Martin Luessi wrote: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> Did you ever figure out how to fix this? I have the same problem on >>>>> CentOS 5.6. I was able to install 4.5.2-r00.1 using the "vanilla" use >>>>> falg, but it seems like this creates trouble later on (things being >>>>> linked to system libraries instead the ones in prefix). >>>> No, I never got it working. I had to give up and move on. >>>> >>>> -- Ricky >>> Ricky, >>> >>> I am sorry to hear that. I belive the problem is that CentOS uses a >>> very old glibc version (2.5), which isn't compatible with newer gcc >>> versions. >> How can it be incompatible with gcc 4.4 if CentOS has 4.4.0 in repositories >> which >> works perfectly. > > I don't know.. all I know is that my workstation at work uses CentOS > 5.6 with gcc 4.1.2 and glibc 2.5, which is consistent with > http://distrowatch.com/table.php?distribution=centos
Maybe you should try RedHat branch of GCC (or just deceive portage and use binary 4.4.0 from CentOS repositories to build prefix) -- Regards, Konstantin
