-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Peter Davoust wrote:
> You bring up an issue I wanted to ask about: Why wouldn't you use gmail
> as your personal e-mail? 

For me it is a couple of things - one is that I prefer to have email
addresses that I can keep that are not client-dependent.  Sure, right
now gmail allows POP3 access, but that could change some day.  Plus,
some day if gmail's spam filters become lousy I don't need to
redistribute new email addresses to everybody I know.

As far as their saving messages go - I've got an IMAP store with just
about every email I've ever sent (well, at least since I started
understanding what I was doing and had PPP/SLIP access to the net).
Gmail might offer the same right now, but down the road if they have a
glitch and lose your email you won't have much recourse (you get what
you pay for).

I just keep all my mail in an IMAP store, and I can try any mail client
I want anytime I want.  I can use thunderbird over vnc over ssh
remotely, or if that lags too much I can just use squirrelmail or
something like that.  I could even open up my IMAP server to the world
and use gmail to read my IMAP mail I suppose (I assume gmail handles
IMAP on other servers).  After all the sylpheed-claws talk a few days
ago I emerged it, tried it out, and now I'm back on thunderbird after
tweaking it.  The nice thing about open standards is that you aren't
married to anything - even if it is something good at the moment.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFFKSYwG4/rWKZmVWkRAqc6AKCjqURRoBA6J1nTvC06rGI/ELyiUACfadBL
lIsB0WpcSMbG8Vl0nXrk/lI=
=CO+f
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Reply via email to