On Wed, 24 Dec 2003 14:13:42 +0100 Christian Gut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | I am using it on more than one box and i spoke with some people that | have no problems either.
That's nice. I'm also using it on a couple of boxes. I also have several boxes that can't even begin to use an unpatched 2.6.x because of compile errors. I have another box that locks solid on heavy filesystem operations under 2.6.x. From several hours in #gentoo, and from reading lkml, I can tell you that I am not alone. | Again: I think vanilla should reflect the state of kernel.org. It does. vanilla- reflects the current state of the kernel.org 2.4.xx series. development- reflects the current state of the kernel.org 2.[56].xx series. Remember: 2.4.xx development is not at an end. Now, if you'd like a rename for either package, then that's an entirely different issue... -- Ciaran McCreesh Mail: ciaranm at gentoo.org Web: http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
