On Wed, 2003-12-24 at 13:55, Markus Nigbur wrote: > On Wed, 24 Dec 2003 13:35:54 +0100 > Christian Gut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I always thought about vanilla, that it reflects the exact state of > > kernel.org so they said its stable it should go stable in its ebuild. > > Further on should one report bugs to gentoo devs when they didn't > > change anything in the kernel except packaging it? So i don't see the > > point why one expect bug reports there... > > it does depend on some more stuff than just the kernel. for example > kernel headers or nptl support in glibc. apparently not every package > does compile correctly with 2.6 kernel and kernel headers yet. same > applies to nptl stuff. > what i want to say here is, the kernel devs won't be too happy to get > flooded by kernel bugs that aren't related to the stock kernel, but the > system around the kernel.
Ok, i can understand that, but what about masking it for ~arch or ~x86 like those other things (glibc)? -- Christian Gut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
