On Sat, 2005-01-08 at 17:41 +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote: > Heh.. I'm not saying the debug eclass is good; I think it is terrible. I'm > suggesting that the CFLAGS be something like "-march=foo -O2 -g" and that > FEATURES include "nostrip" by default, including the stages and GRP. From a > support point of view, it should make things a lot easier.
Hmm i thought that it was on the portage TODO to introduce a debug FEATURE which compiles packs in such a way that upstream devs and us get usable backtraces, implementing what the debug eclass is trying to do now in a clean way. At least that was what I got told last time this got brought up iirc (several months ago). This was going to be added post .51 ? - foser
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
