On Sat, 2005-01-08 at 12:34 -0500, Alec wrote: > Part of me is torn here. Having debuging enabled on GRP and stages > sounds like a great idea in theory. I guess the deal is how much the > users are going to complain when they find out that all their programs > are built with debugging symbols? Granted it's not a problem for me > personally because I build from stage1 all the time, so I'll gladly > remove the FEATURE, but some people are installing gentoo on small > drives. How much extra space does debugging info take up on a system, > or on the LiveCD?
Speaking of debugging info, perhaps this could be done using techniques similar to RH's debuginfo rpms, where the debug stuff is separate from the "standard" executable. Has anyone looked into this?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
