On Sun, 09 Jan 2005 11:04:22 -0500, Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, 2005-01-08 at 12:34 -0500, Alec wrote: > > Part of me is torn here. Having debuging enabled on GRP and stages > > sounds like a great idea in theory. I guess the deal is how much the > > users are going to complain when they find out that all their programs > > are built with debugging symbols? Granted it's not a problem for me > > personally because I build from stage1 all the time, so I'll gladly > > remove the FEATURE, but some people are installing gentoo on small > > drives. How much extra space does debugging info take up on a system, > > or on the LiveCD?
Regarding USE=debug, Alec, please add debug to your use flags, emerge -upv nano --newuse and then open up nano and hit return a couple times ;-) it's completely fubar... and that's just a single package that uses USE="debug" in new and interesting ways... not a good idea. tester: sounds good to me ;-) i'd love to see a way to include SOME kind of debugging information globally for backtracing, even if it requires keeping things a little seperated. -- ________________________________________ To avoid being added to my spam filter: 1. Utilize list replies unless otherwise requested. 2. If you DO send me a personal email, use english. 3. HTML isn't cute. It belongs on the web, not in my inbox. -- [email protected] mailing list
