On Tuesday 25 January 2005 06:23 am, Aaron Walker wrote: > At the time, I thought it would be better implemented as a portage builtin > like doenvd for example, but as ciaranm informed me, we are trying to break > those out and into eclasses (eutils would be my guess).
not eclasses, but yes, we are trying to break portage up into smaller mini-portage packages last i heard > Does everyone agree on eutils? yes, as long as you add my `use pam || return 0` suggestion i mentioned on irc -mike -- [email protected] mailing list
