-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Mike Frysinger wrote:
| On Tuesday 25 January 2005 06:23 am, Aaron Walker wrote:
|
|>At the time, I thought it would be better implemented as a portage builtin
|>like doenvd for example, but as ciaranm informed me, we are trying to break
|>those out and into eclasses (eutils would be my guess).
|
|
| not eclasses, but yes, we are trying to break portage up into smaller
| mini-portage packages last i heard
|
|
|>Does everyone agree on eutils?
|
|
| yes, as long as you add my `use pam || return 0` suggestion i mentioned on irc
| -mike

I added it right after our discussion on irc.


- -- The longer the title, the less important the job.

Aaron Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[ Gentoo/BSD | cron | forensics | shell-tools | commonbox | netmon ]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFB+3nqC3poscuANHARAmcZAKC+H60p3x+5xAgsDABeP5MraSWEDwCgwT2w
w0OCAG9fD8QsMaOTfr0YzEs=
=raID
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
[email protected] mailing list



Reply via email to