Solar,
I realize you meant this as a general statement of opinion and not a
flame-baiter, but can you elaborate on:
On Sunday 05 June 2005 11:37, Ned Ludd wrote:
> Invalidates binary package trees.
My (wrong?) understanding was that this is addressed when portage runs a
fixpackages (otherwise what's it doing to all those binary packages?). I ask
because its no secret that I'm working on a split up of dev-perl from the
500+ packages to a better organized, reasonable scenario where packages are
categorized based on, well, category :) rather than on the fact that they
"contain some perl bits or module bits, stuff them in dev-perl".
Just curious, it's not my intent to hurt anyone's trees along the way :)
-mike
--
[email protected] mailing list
