On Saturday 17 September 2005 02:22 pm, Mark Loeser wrote:
> Kevin F. Quinn wrote:
> >> I would also like to see many of them, if not all, moved to the dev-cpp
> >>category:
> >
> > Is this bit really necessary?
> The reason for me adding that bit is the metadata from dev-cpp:
> The dev-cpp category contains libraries and utilities relevant to the
> c++ programming language.
> Now to me, that means I can find *all* relevant C++ stuff here.  If we
> don't want that to be the case, maybe we should say "miscellaneous", but
> why should something be in dev-libs, as compared with dev-cpp?
> net-libs, I could understand, and dev-games, as those could be argued to
> have a direct relation.

for generic C++ packages (STLport/boost for example), i can see them being in 
the dev-cpp category ... but for packages which have specific uses already 
and arent in 'generic' categories, i dont think they should be moved
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Reply via email to