Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 19:31:24 +0100 "Stefan Schweizer" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > | What about if we just skip your "policies" and let the overlays be a > | free place where people can handle issues how they think it is right > | for the specific case and not how $super_dev said somewhere. That is > | what overlays are about, not? > > Sounds like a perfect way to break lots and lots of systems. Those > policies are mostly there for good reason.
You want to apply policies on overlays? Well no - sorry, overlays are none of QA's or any other policy business. They are overlays, not official tree. If user installs ebuilds from overlay and breaks his system, then well - not a Gentoo problem. Why should any policies apply? -- Best regards, Jakub Moc mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG signature: http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E ... still no signature ;)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
