On Wed, 17 May 2006 15:25:08 +0100 "George Prowse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why risk anything by changing the tree to suit the package? We're not risking anything, except upsetting a few people. We're not changing anything either, just adding a few files. > It just > seems like asking for trouble. The overlay ability is there for a > reason. Yes, to work around a lack of multiple repository support. It's not there to try to mix profiles between repositories. > Paludis isn't being used and should be kept out of the sphere > of users use until it is usable, wont break systems and is > trustworthy enough to be near the tree It is, it is, it won't unless the user screws up (as with, say, Portage), and it is. -- [email protected] mailing list
