On Wed, 17 May 2006 20:56:14 +0000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tim Yamin) wrote: > Well, if you're going to have a package manager that delivers the > same result as Portage it must therefore work with Catalyst...
Paludis can produce the same end result as Portage. The reason it won't work with catalyst is that the interface is different. Once again, this is going far beyond the scope of the initial discussion. I'm not saying that Paludis should replace Portage, nor that it should be an "officially supported package manager". The question is simply one of whether I can add a top-level paludis profile without people complaining overmuch, or whether I have to go through the arch teams and make sub-profiles in 4 different places under default-linux/. -- [email protected] mailing list
