On Friday 19 May 2006 08:25, Paul de Vrieze wrote: > On Thursday 18 May 2006 22:37, Stephen Bennett wrote: > > On Thu, 18 May 2006 21:35:01 +0200 > > > > Carsten Lohrke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Sure baselayout is. An there're others in the tree, But that doesn't > > > mean these variants are supported (special cases like embedded > > > aside). > > > > So they're unsupported alternatives to one of the core parts of gentoo, > > which have profiles for them in the tree. What's different? > > They are at least partly supported. Also they do not aim to replace > baselayout as the main gentoo basic setup.
As someone who's talked to initng devs since their project began and someone who has contribed code so that networking worked on init-ng with a Gentoo config I can assure you that their goal is to replace baselayout in Gentoo. OMFG - lets rip initng from the tree as it's going to replace my lovely baselayout</sarcasm> -- Roy Marples <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Gentoo/Linux Developer (baselayout, networking) -- [email protected] mailing list
